Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Esper Pixie | mortadela | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Esper Pixie | msmayer | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Dimir Bounce | __bmj__ | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Esper Pixie | pepeteam | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Dimir Bounce | txepi | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Azorius Bounce , Dimir Bounce , Dimir Midrange , Esper Pixie , Grixis Bounce , Izzet Spellslingers , Sultai Bounce , Unclassified , Unknown Archetype
Fear of Isolation ranks #160 out of approximately 339 cards in raw efficiency (top 47%).
Blue average: 58.7%
Performance compared to other Blue cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Fear of Isolation is a decent card with average performance in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 14.53 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 69.7%. Fear of Isolation has a win rate of 68.6%, making it 1.6% worse than other 2-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Saiba Cryptomancer | Creature — Moonfolk Ninja | 27 | 80.8% | 14 |
Thought-Stalker Warlock | Creature — Lizard Warlock | 35 | 80.0% | 15 |
Knight of Grace | Creature — Human Knight | 51 | 72.1% | 27 |
Invasion of Amonkhet | Battle — Siege | 10 | 70.5% | 5 |
Scrollshift | Instant | 20 | 69.8% | 7 |
Defabricate | Instant | 5 | 68.6% | 3 |
Prophetic Prism | Artifact | 5 | 67.8% | 2 |
Sunpearl Kirin | Creature — Kirin | 47 | 65.6% | 16 |
Wilt-Leaf Liege | Creature — Elf Knight | 74 | 64.3% | 17 |
Elspeth's Smite | Instant | 6 | 59.7% | 1 |
Cards that perform better with Fear of Isolation than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Anoint with Affliction | Instant | 2 | 6 | 88.5% | 67.9% | +20.5% |
Gix's Command | Sorcery | 5 | 48 | 73.1% | 68.3% | +4.8% |
Floodpits Drowner | Creature — Merfolk | 2 | 47 | 73.6% | 69.4% | +4.2% |
Saiba Cryptomancer | Creature — Moonfolk Ninja | 2 | 18 | 76.7% | 72.6% | +4.1% |
Cut Down | Instant | 1 | 44 | 72.7% | 69.0% | +3.7% |
Tishana's Tidebinder | Creature — Merfolk Wizard | 3 | 48 | 72.5% | 69.1% | +3.4% |
Spyglass Siren | Creature — Siren Pirate | 1 | 44 | 72.7% | 69.7% | +2.9% |
Thought-Stalker Warlock | Creature — Lizard Warlock | 3 | 6 | 69.2% | 66.5% | +2.7% |
Get Out | Instant | 2 | 41 | 73.3% | 70.9% | +2.4% |
Malicious Eclipse | Sorcery | 3 | 11 | 70.3% | 68.1% | +2.2% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Esper Pixie | 1524 | 98.5% | 54.0% |
Dimir Bounce | 347 | 70.7% | 49.3% |
Dimir Midrange | 274 | 13.3% | 48.7% |
Unknown Archetype | 8 | 2.5% | 33.8% |
Grixis Bounce | 5 | 100.0% | 78.6% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.